UGA legl 2700 Test 3 Court Cases Roessing Q&A 2025 Update

Content Preview

UGA legl 2700 Test 3 Court Cases (Roessing), Q&A Latest 2025/2026 | 100% PASS Montz v Pilgrim Films & Television, INC. - Answer -Plaintiff pitched idea to NBC and was rejected -> NBC created Ghost Hunters -> sued for breach of implied-in-fact contract to pay for the use of the reality show concept "as a result of cases like Montz, some firms are wary of accepting unsolicited product ideas unless a clearly defined contractual relationship exists" Gottlieb & Co INC. v. Alps South Corporation - Answer -Plaintiff was in the business of supplying specialty knitted fabrics to manufacturers. Defendant was a manufacturer of medical devices such as prosthetic limbs. Plaintiff substituted the yarn used causing Defendant to suffer severe economic loss. Court was required to determine whether the limitation on consequential damages became part of the parties' final contract. Vassilkovska v. Woodfield Nissan, INC. - Answer --Vassilkovska promised to arbitrate any claim against Woodfield instead of suing in court -Vassilkovska sued Woodfield for misrepresenting the price of the car in a financing agreement, Woofield argued that Vassilkovska was required to arbitrate the claim -court denied Woodfields motion to dismiss and compel arbitration